SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT: SECTION 125 CR.P.C. IS TO PROVIDE IMMEDIATE RELIEF TO APPLICANT IN A SUMMARY PROCEEDINGS, WHEREAS RIGHT UNDER SECTION 20 READ WITH SECTION 3(B) OF THE HINDU ADOPTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACT, 1956 CONTAINS LARGER RIGHT, WHICH NEEDS DETERMINATION BY A CIVIL COURT, HENCE FOR THE LARGER CLAIMS AS ENSHRINED UNDER SECTION 20, THE PROCEEDINGS NEED TO BE INITIATED UNDER SECTION 20 OF THE HINDU ADOPTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACT, 1956 AND THE LEGISLATURE NEVER CONTEMPLATED TO BURDEN THE MAGISTRATE WHILE EXERCISING JURISDICTION UNDER SECTION 125 CR.P.C. TO DETERMINE THE CLAIMS CONTEMPLATED BY THE HINDU ADOPTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACT, 1956.

 

 

 

 

NAME

MOBILE NO.

E-MAIL I’D

RANJEET KUMAR

83830984789667769795

rk@courtkutchehry.com

JAI THAKUR

81307033349355723300

jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com

RAJEEV RANJAN

9334553249

rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com

ASHOK MISHRA

9718327746

sales@courtkutchehry.com

RAVI KUMAR


ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com


A Full Bench of the Supreme Court held that as a preposition of law, an unmarried Hindu daughter can claim maintenance from her father till she is married relying on Section 20(3) of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956,provided she pleads and proves that she is unable to maintain herself, for enforcement of which right her application/suit has to be under Section 20 of the  Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956.The Full Bench  while upholding the orders passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate as well as learned Additional Sessions Judge in the revision held that the said order was not required to be interfered with by the High Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The Supreme Court viewed that the purpose and object of Section 125 Cr.P.C. is to provide immediate relief to applicant in a summary proceedings, whereas right under Section 20 read with Section 3(b) of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 contains larger right, which needs determination by a Civil Court, hence for the larger claims as enshrined under Section 20, the proceedings need to be initiated under Section 20 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 and the legislature never contemplated to burden the Magistrate while exercising jurisdiction under Section 125 Cr.P.C. to determine the claims contemplated by the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT ON DIRECTING A FRESH/ DE NOVO INVESTIGATION EVEN AFTER INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN CONCLUDED AND POLICE REPORT SUBMITTED UNDER SECTION 173(2) OF THE CR. P.C. THOUGH UNDER SECTION 173 (8) OF CR.P.C. ONLY A FURTHER INVESTIGATION CAN BE ORDERED.

SUPREME COURT FULL BENCH JUDGMENT ON A REFERENCE ARISING OUT OF CONFLICT BETWEEN TWO DIVISION BENCH DECISIONS IN JOGINDER TULI VS. S.L. BHATIA, (1996) 10 SC CK 0017 AND OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD. VS. MODERN CONSTRUCTION & CO., (2013) 10 SC CK 0043 WITH REGARD TO QUESTION OF LAW IF A PLAINT IS RETURNED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 10 AND 10A OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1908, FOR PRESENTATION IN THE COURT IN WHICH IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN INSTITUTED, WHETHER THE SUIT SHALL PROCEED DE NOVO OR WILL IT CONTINUE FROM THE STAGE WHERE IT WAS PENDING BEFORE THE COURT AT THE TIME OF RETURNING OF THE PLAINT.

SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT ON SECTION 142(2)(a) OF THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT